On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:26:31 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> BTW I suspect the stats code is broken for
> cross-endian platforms: it should do LE unconditinally,
> should it not?
Stats are guest-endian for legacy, so no. Only the config space is
always LE.
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:49:42 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 01:35:21PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:26:31 +0200
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:02:58AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >
> > > > Also, does
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 01:35:21PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:26:31 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:02:58AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
> > > Also, doesn't get_features need to be modified as well so that
> > > VERSION_1 is adverti
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:26:31 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:02:58AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > Also, doesn't get_features need to be modified as well so that
> > VERSION_1 is advertised?
>
> virtio_pci_device_plugged seems to set it ATM. I'll re-test to conf
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:02:58AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 17:00:48 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > Virtio 1.0 doesn't include a modern balloon device. At some point we'll
> > likely define an incompatible interface with a different ID and
> > different semant
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 17:00:48 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> Virtio 1.0 doesn't include a modern balloon device. At some point we'll
> likely define an incompatible interface with a different ID and
> different semantics. But for now, it's not a big effort to support a
> transitional balloo
Virtio 1.0 doesn't include a modern balloon device. At some point we'll
likely define an incompatible interface with a different ID and
different semantics. But for now, it's not a big effort to support a
transitional balloon device: this has the advantage of supporting
existing drivers, transpar
