On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:16:01PM +0800, Liu ping fan wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:36:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 11/27/2011 04:42 AM, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> >> > From: Liu Ping Fan
> >> >
> >> > The vcpu can be safely rele
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:36:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 11/27/2011 04:42 AM, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>> > From: Liu Ping Fan
>> >
>> > The vcpu can be safely released when
>> > --1.guest tells us that the vcpu is not needed any longer.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:36:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/27/2011 04:42 AM, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> > From: Liu Ping Fan
> >
> > The vcpu can be safely released when
> > --1.guest tells us that the vcpu is not needed any longer.
> > --2.vcpu hits the last instruction _halt_
> >
> > If both
On 11/27/2011 04:42 AM, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> From: Liu Ping Fan
>
> The vcpu can be safely released when
> --1.guest tells us that the vcpu is not needed any longer.
> --2.vcpu hits the last instruction _halt_
>
> If both of the conditions are satisfied, kvm exits to userspace
> with the reason v
From: Liu Ping Fan
The vcpu can be safely released when
--1.guest tells us that the vcpu is not needed any longer.
--2.vcpu hits the last instruction _halt_
If both of the conditions are satisfied, kvm exits to userspace
with the reason vcpu dead. So the user thread can exit safely.
Signed-off-
