On 4/18/2014 2:10 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/18/2014 07:50 AM, Tom Musta wrote:
[...]
>
> The forms seem equally readable to me, with the advantage that we'll get good
> branch prediction on direct subroutine calls. And if the compiler decides
> that
> inlining is profitable, it'll hav
On 04/18/2014 07:50 AM, Tom Musta wrote:
> +__attribute__ ((unused))
> +static void dfp_run_post_processors(struct PPC_DFP *dfp,
> +PPC_DFP_PostProc post_processors[], const size_t n)
> +{
> +int i;
> +
> +for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> +post_processors[i](dfp);
> +
On 04/18/2014 07:50 AM, Tom Musta wrote:
> +PPC_DFP_PostProc ADD_PPs[] = {
static const.
r~
Add emulation of the PowerPC Decimal Floating Point Add instructions dadd[q][.]
Various GCC unused annotations are removed since it is now safe to remove them.
Signed-off-by: Tom Musta
---
target-ppc/dfp_helper.c | 129 +--
target-ppc/helper.h |
