Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 17/21] qapi: Drop unused non-strict qobject input visitor

2017-02-26 Thread Markus Armbruster
Eric Blake writes: > On 02/24/2017 09:02 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Paolo Bonzini writes: >> >>> On 23/02/2017 22:45, Markus Armbruster wrote: The split between tests/test-qobject-input-visitor.c and tests/test-qobject-input-strict.c now makes less sense than ever. The next

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 17/21] qapi: Drop unused non-strict qobject input visitor

2017-02-25 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/24/2017 09:02 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Paolo Bonzini writes: > >> On 23/02/2017 22:45, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> The split between tests/test-qobject-input-visitor.c and >>> tests/test-qobject-input-strict.c now makes less sense than ever. The >>> next commit will take care of tha

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 17/21] qapi: Drop unused non-strict qobject input visitor

2017-02-24 Thread Markus Armbruster
Paolo Bonzini writes: > On 23/02/2017 22:45, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> The split between tests/test-qobject-input-visitor.c and >> tests/test-qobject-input-strict.c now makes less sense than ever. The >> next commit will take care of that. > > I'm actually adding a use for non-strict visitors

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 17/21] qapi: Drop unused non-strict qobject input visitor

2017-02-24 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 23/02/2017 22:45, Markus Armbruster wrote: > The split between tests/test-qobject-input-visitor.c and > tests/test-qobject-input-strict.c now makes less sense than ever. The > next commit will take care of that. I'm actually adding a use for non-strict visitors (and one that makes sense IMHO

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 17/21] qapi: Drop unused non-strict qobject input visitor

2017-02-23 Thread Markus Armbruster
The split between tests/test-qobject-input-visitor.c and tests/test-qobject-input-strict.c now makes less sense than ever. The next commit will take care of that. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster --- block/nbd.c | 2 +- block/nfs.c | 2 +- blo