On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> With this change, we sent arrays as arrays, making state description
> much simpler. The change is incompatible, but as far as I know, sparc
> don't care about migration compatibility beteween versions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
Ack
Am 04.05.2012 15:00, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 4 May 2012 12:35, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Not even [cc'ing] Acked-by (or is git-send-email
>> case-sensitive? it's spelled "Acked-By" in lm32 patch).
>
> FWIW, git-send-email is not case-sensitive when looking for
> things indicating it should CC
On 4 May 2012 12:35, Andreas Färber wrote:
> It appears once again none of these patches are actually cc'ing the
> proper maintainers. Not even Acked-by (or is git-send-email
> case-sensitive? it's spelled "Acked-By" in lm32 patch).
FWIW, git-send-email is not case-sensitive when looking for
thin
With this change, we sent arrays as arrays, making state description
much simpler. The change is incompatible, but as far as I know, sparc
don't care about migration compatibility beteween versions.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
---
target-sparc/machine.c | 172 +++--
Am 04.05.2012 12:54, schrieb Juan Quintela:
> With this change, we sent arrays as arrays, making state description
"send"?
> much simpler. The change is incompatible, but as far as I know, sparc
> don't care about migration compatibility beteween versions.
"the SPARC targets don't" (or "sparc d
