On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:14 AM, malc wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
>> Use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_R1 etc. for consistency.
>
> You spell it TCG_REG_CALL_STACK in the subject/comment but
> REG_CALL_STACK in the patch, which suggest that it was never
> even compile
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_R1 etc. for consistency.
You spell it TCG_REG_CALL_STACK in the subject/comment but
REG_CALL_STACK in the patch, which suggest that it was never
even compile tested.
[..snip..]
--
mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
Use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_R1 etc. for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl
---
tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c | 17 ++---
tcg/ppc64/tcg-target.c | 16 +---
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c b/tcg/ppc/tcg-ta
Use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_R1 etc. for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl
---
tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c | 17 ++---
tcg/ppc64/tcg-target.c | 16 +---
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c b/tcg/ppc/tcg-ta