On 11/20/2010 02:25 AM, adq wrote:
> On 20 November 2010 00:41, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 19:39 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:47:36PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
aio_ioctl is emulated anyway and currently broken.
>>>
>>> What
On 20 November 2010 08:23, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 01:25 +, adq wrote:
>> On 20 November 2010 00:41, Nicholas A. Bellinger
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 19:39 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:47:36PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke w
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 01:25 +, adq wrote:
> On 20 November 2010 00:41, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 19:39 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:47:36PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >> >
> >> > aio_ioctl is emulated anyway and currently bro
On 20 November 2010 00:41, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 19:39 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:47:36PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> >
>> > aio_ioctl is emulated anyway and currently broken.
>>
>> What's broken about it currently?
>
> Mm,
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 19:39 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:47:36PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >
> > aio_ioctl is emulated anyway and currently broken.
>
> What's broken about it currently?
Mm, I do not recall this being broken in the first place..? There
w
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:47:36PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>
> aio_ioctl is emulated anyway and currently broken.
What's broken about it currently?
> So better use 'normal' ioctl here as there are no benefits
> on using the emulated async I/O call.
There are huge benefits. Without it the
aio_ioctl is emulated anyway and currently broken.
So better use 'normal' ioctl here as there are no benefits
on using the emulated async I/O call.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
hw/scsi-generic.c | 21 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/
