This patch add support for a system control block. It is supposed to
act as helper for the emulated program. E.g. shutting down the VM or
printing test results. This model is intended for testing purposes only and
doesn't fit to any real hardware. Therefore, it is not added to any board
by default.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am Freitag 11 Februar 2011, 22:03:40 schrieb Blue Swirl:
>> > +static int lm32_sys_init(SysBusDevice *dev)
>> > +{
>> > + LM32SysState *s = FROM_SYSBUS(typeof(*s), dev);
>> > + int sys_regs;
>> > +
>> > + sys_regs = cpu_register_io_
Am Freitag 11 Februar 2011, 22:03:40 schrieb Blue Swirl:
> > +static int lm32_sys_init(SysBusDevice *dev)
> > +{
> > +LM32SysState *s = FROM_SYSBUS(typeof(*s), dev);
> > +int sys_regs;
> > +
> > +sys_regs = cpu_register_io_memory(sys_read_fn, sys_write_fn, s,
> > +DEVICE_NAT
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Michael Walle wrote:
> This patch add support for a system control block. It is supposed to
> act as helper for the emulated program. E.g. shutting down the VM or
> printing test results. This model is intended for testing purposes only and
> doesn't fit to any rea
This patch add support for a system control block. It is supposed to
act as helper for the emulated program. E.g. shutting down the VM or
printing test results. This model is intended for testing purposes only and
doesn't fit to any real hardware. Therefore, it is not added to any board
by default.
This patch add support for a system control block. It is supposed to
act as helper for the emulated program. E.g. shutting down the VM or
printing test results. This model is intended for testing purposes only and
doesn't fit to any real hardware. Therefore, it is not added to any board
by default.
