On 08/09/2012 10:27 AM, liu ping fan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 08/08/2012 09:25 AM, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>>> From: Liu Ping Fan
>>>
>>
>> Please explain the motivation. AFAICT, the big qemu lock is sufficient.
>>
> Oh, this is one of the series locks for the
Il 09/08/2012 09:28, liu ping fan ha scritto:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 08/08/2012 08:25, Liu Ping Fan ha scritto:
>>> From: Liu Ping Fan
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan
>>> ---
>>> cpus.c | 12
>>> main-loop.h |3 +++
>>> 2 files c
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 08/08/2012 08:25, Liu Ping Fan ha scritto:
>> From: Liu Ping Fan
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan
>> ---
>> cpus.c | 12
>> main-loop.h |3 +++
>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --gi
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/08/2012 09:25 AM, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>> From: Liu Ping Fan
>>
>
> Please explain the motivation. AFAICT, the big qemu lock is sufficient.
>
Oh, this is one of the series locks for the removal of big qemu lock.
The degradation of big lock
On 08/08/2012 09:25 AM, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> From: Liu Ping Fan
>
Please explain the motivation. AFAICT, the big qemu lock is sufficient.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Il 08/08/2012 08:25, Liu Ping Fan ha scritto:
> From: Liu Ping Fan
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan
> ---
> cpus.c | 12
> main-loop.h |3 +++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
> index b182b3d..a734b36 100644
> --- a/cpu
From: Liu Ping Fan
Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan
---
cpus.c | 12
main-loop.h |3 +++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
index b182b3d..a734b36 100644
--- a/cpus.c
+++ b/cpus.c
@@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static void qemu_tcg_init_cpu_s
