On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:36:01PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:08:42 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/qom/qdev-properties.c b/qom/qdev-properties.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..2e82cb9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/qom/qdev-properties.c
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:08:42 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/qom/qdev-properties.c b/qom/qdev-properties.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..2e82cb9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/qom/qdev-properties.c
[...]
> +void qdev_prop_set_globals(DeviceState *dev)
> +{
> +ObjectClass *
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:21:17PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 October 2012 19:11, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > It's dangerously close to bike-shedding, but i don't think qdev belongs
> > in qom/. It's not core infrastructure. It's the device base class and
> > belongs IMHO in hw/.
>
> "-
On 17 October 2012 19:11, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> It's dangerously close to bike-shedding, but i don't think qdev belongs
> in qom/. It's not core infrastructure. It's the device base class and
> belongs IMHO in hw/.
"-user emulators don't get anything from hw/" is one of those semi
arbitrary
