On 06/04/2015 06:20 PM, John Snow wrote:
> If we wish to make differential backups a feature that's easy to access,
> it might be pertinent to rename the "dirty-bitmap" mode to "incremental"
> to make it clear what /type/ of backup the dirty-bitmap is helping us
> perform.
>
> This is an API break
If we wish to make differential backups a feature that's easy to access,
it might be pertinent to rename the "dirty-bitmap" mode to "incremental"
to make it clear what /type/ of backup the dirty-bitmap is helping us
perform.
This is an API breaking change, but 2.4 has not yet gone live,
so we have
