Am 25.09.2015 um 16:49 schrieb Eric Blake:
> On 09/25/2015 06:39 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> All integers would get parsed by strtoll(), not handling the case of
>> UINT64 properties with the most significient bit set.
>>
>> Implement a .type_uint64 visitor callback, reusing the existing
>> parse_
On 09/30/2015 07:23 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 30.09.2015 um 15:19 schrieb Markus Armbruster:
>> Andreas Färber writes:
>>> As a bug fix, ignore warnings about preference of qemu_strto[u]ll().
>>
>> I'm not sure I get this sentence.
>
> This patch causes checkpatch warnings. I intentionally d
On 09/30/2015 07:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> The (essentially undocumented) Visitor abstraction has the following
> methods for integers:
I proposed documentation at:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-09/msg05434.html
>
> * Mandatory: type_int()
>
> Interface uses i
Am 30.09.2015 um 15:19 schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> Andreas Färber writes:
>> As a bug fix, ignore warnings about preference of qemu_strto[u]ll().
>
> I'm not sure I get this sentence.
This patch causes checkpatch warnings. I intentionally do not address
them in this bug-fix patch, but instead i
Andreas Färber writes:
> All integers would get parsed by strtoll(), not handling the case of
> UINT64 properties with the most significient bit set.
This mess is part of a bigger mess, I'm afraid.
The major ways integers get parsed are:
* QMP: parse_literal() in qmp/qobject/json-parser.c
T
On 09/25/2015 06:39 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> All integers would get parsed by strtoll(), not handling the case of
> UINT64 properties with the most significient bit set.
>
> Implement a .type_uint64 visitor callback, reusing the existing
> parse_str() code through a new argument, using strtoull
All integers would get parsed by strtoll(), not handling the case of
UINT64 properties with the most significient bit set.
Implement a .type_uint64 visitor callback, reusing the existing
parse_str() code through a new argument, using strtoull().
As a bug fix, ignore warnings about preference of q
