Am 05.09.2012 15:08, schrieb Jeff Cody:
> On 09/05/2012 08:47 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 30.08.2012 20:47, schrieb Jeff Cody:
>>> I believe the bs->keep_read_only flag is supposed to reflect
>>> the initial open state of the device. If the device is initially
>>> opened R/O, then commit operations
On 09/05/2012 08:47 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 30.08.2012 20:47, schrieb Jeff Cody:
>> I believe the bs->keep_read_only flag is supposed to reflect
>> the initial open state of the device. If the device is initially
>> opened R/O, then commit operations, or reopen operations changing
>> to R/W, are
Am 30.08.2012 20:47, schrieb Jeff Cody:
> I believe the bs->keep_read_only flag is supposed to reflect
> the initial open state of the device. If the device is initially
> opened R/O, then commit operations, or reopen operations changing
> to R/W, are prohibited.
>
> Currently, the keep_read_only
I believe the bs->keep_read_only flag is supposed to reflect
the initial open state of the device. If the device is initially
opened R/O, then commit operations, or reopen operations changing
to R/W, are prohibited.
Currently, the keep_read_only flag is only accurate for the active
layer, and its
