On 06/27/2013 07:09 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 06/27/2013 04:44 PM, mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: "Michael R. Hines"
As requested, the protocol now includes memory unpinning support.
This has been implemented in a non-optimized manner, in such a way
that one could devise an LRU or othe
On 06/27/2013 04:44 PM, mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> From: "Michael R. Hines"
>
> As requested, the protocol now includes memory unpinning support.
> This has been implemented in a non-optimized manner, in such a way
> that one could devise an LRU or other workload-specific information
> o
From: "Michael R. Hines"
As requested, the protocol now includes memory unpinning support.
This has been implemented in a non-optimized manner, in such a way
that one could devise an LRU or other workload-specific information
on top of the basic mechanism to influence the way unpinning happens
du
