And of cause, it is not the excuse to let me stop:
- I shall integrate binutils disassembler firstly in my own branch for
the related test and learning.
- According to binutils disassembler implementation, I shall write
translate.c step by step.
- After finish translate.c, I shall send
On 2/17/15 10:48, Chen Gang S wrote:
> On 2/17/15 08:11, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> On 2/16/2015 6:46 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 17 February 2015 at 08:08, Chen Gang S wrote:
On 2/16/15 23:24, Max Filippov wrote:
> Disassembler is not a crucial part of QEMU target.
For me, it is ne
On 2/17/15 08:11, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 2/16/2015 6:46 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 17 February 2015 at 08:08, Chen Gang S wrote:
>>> On 2/16/15 23:24, Max Filippov wrote:
Disassembler is not a crucial part of QEMU target.
>>> For me, it is necessary. We need disassemble target binary i
Yes, I think there is a bit less documentation on tilegx SPRs available.
If this becomes a blocker for you, let me know and I will see if there is
anything
we can do about it. Probably best to wait until you have made more progress
on qemu before trying to make a case for it internally, though.
On 2/17/15 08:29, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> Yes, I think there is a bit less documentation on tilegx SPRs available.
> If this becomes a blocker for you, let me know and I will see if there is
> anything
> we can do about it. Probably best to wait until you have made more progress
> on qemu before t
On 2/16/2015 6:46 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 17 February 2015 at 08:08, Chen Gang S wrote:
On 2/16/15 23:24, Max Filippov wrote:
Disassembler is not a crucial part of QEMU target.
For me, it is necessary. We need disassemble target binary instructions
(recognize them), then translate them in
On 17 February 2015 at 08:08, Chen Gang S wrote:
> On 2/16/15 23:24, Max Filippov wrote:
>> Disassembler is not a crucial part of QEMU target.
>
> For me, it is necessary. We need disassemble target binary instructions
> (recognize them), then translate them into tcg instructions which are
> group
On 2/16/15 23:00, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 2/16/2015 9:44 AM, Chen Gang S wrote:
>> Excuse me, after comparing the code details between kernel version
>> disassembler and binutils version disassembler, I am sure the kernel
>> version disassembler is the part of the binutils version disassembler:
>
On 2/16/15 23:24, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Chen Gang S wrote:
>> I guess, for qemu, we need !DISASM_ONLY, and may need BFD_RELOC, and may
>> need the latest decode_X1_fsm, and also may need !__KERNEL__ -- which
>> means we will use the full binutils version disassembl
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Chen Gang S wrote:
> I guess, for qemu, we need !DISASM_ONLY, and may need BFD_RELOC, and may
> need the latest decode_X1_fsm, and also may need !__KERNEL__ -- which
> means we will use the full binutils version disassembler!!
Disassembler is not a crucial part of
On 2/16/2015 9:44 AM, Chen Gang S wrote:
Excuse me, after comparing the code details between kernel version
disassembler and binutils version disassembler, I am sure the kernel
version disassembler is the part of the binutils version disassembler:
Yes, exactly. We used an unifdef tool and some
Excuse me, after comparing the code details between kernel version
disassembler and binutils version disassembler, I am sure the kernel
version disassembler is the part of the binutils version disassembler:
- kernel version is DISASM_ONLY.
- kernel version does not need BFD_RELOC.
- kernel v
Excuse me, I want to consult the related information about SPR.
For SPRs (Special Purpose Register) under tilegx, I can not get related
documents (I only got the tilepro related document for SPR). After read
through the source code of Linux kernel for tile, I guess:
- SPRs are in "arch/tile/incl
On 2/14/15 13:47, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 14 February 2015 at 03:37, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> I'm not sure whether Tilera can simply re-release the tilegx-specific stuff
>> from binutils as a separate tarball with GPL v2 licensing. Hopefully we can
>> avoid having to figure that out. :-)
>
> I
On 2/14/15 11:37, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 2/13/2015 10:08 PM, Chen Gang S wrote:
>> On 2/14/15 08:26, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 13 February 2015 at 23:50, Chen Gang S wrote:
On 2/13/15 05:15, Chen Gang S wrote:
> It almost likes a template for adding an architecture target.
>
On 14 February 2015 at 03:37, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> I'm not sure whether Tilera can simply re-release the tilegx-specific stuff
> from binutils as a separate tarball with GPL v2 licensing. Hopefully we can
> avoid having to figure that out. :-)
I believe it is theoretically possible (the usual
On 2/13/2015 10:08 PM, Chen Gang S wrote:
On 2/14/15 08:26, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 13 February 2015 at 23:50, Chen Gang S wrote:
On 2/13/15 05:15, Chen Gang S wrote:
It almost likes a template for adding an architecture target.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
---
configure
On 14 February 2015 at 03:08, Chen Gang S wrote:
> Yeah, I shall add disassembler firstly, before generate tcg code:
>
> - binutils tilegx disassembler is easy to be integrated into qemu.
>
> - I shall reuse part of the tilegx disassembler code for generating tcg
>code.
>
> - For me, dumpin
On 2/14/15 10:40, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/13/2015 04:26 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Oh, it needs to use "TARGET_ARCH=tilegx" instead of "TARGET_ARCH=tile",
>>> or can not put "CONFIG_TILE_DIS=y" to config-all-disas.mak, below (when
>>> I am adding "disas/tilegx.c", I meet it).
>>
>> You n
On 2/14/15 08:26, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 February 2015 at 23:50, Chen Gang S wrote:
>>
>> On 2/13/15 05:15, Chen Gang S wrote:
>>> It almost likes a template for adding an architecture target.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
>>> ---
>>> configure | 7 ++
>>>
On 02/13/2015 04:26 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Oh, it needs to use "TARGET_ARCH=tilegx" instead of "TARGET_ARCH=tile",
>> or can not put "CONFIG_TILE_DIS=y" to config-all-disas.mak, below (when
>> I am adding "disas/tilegx.c", I meet it).
>
> You need to make up your mind about what your architec
On 13 February 2015 at 23:50, Chen Gang S wrote:
>
> On 2/13/15 05:15, Chen Gang S wrote:
>> It almost likes a template for adding an architecture target.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
>> ---
>> configure | 7 ++
>> default-configs/tilegx-linux-user.mak | 1 +
>>
On 2/13/15 05:15, Chen Gang S wrote:
> It almost likes a template for adding an architecture target.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
> ---
> configure | 7 ++
> default-configs/tilegx-linux-user.mak | 1 +
> target-tile/Makefile.objs | 1 +
> target-ti
It almost likes a template for adding an architecture target.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
---
configure | 7 ++
default-configs/tilegx-linux-user.mak | 1 +
target-tile/Makefile.objs | 1 +
target-tile/cpu-qom.h | 72 +++
ta
24 matches
Mail list logo
