Am 03.11.2015 um 01:48 schrieb John Snow:
On 10/12/2015 08:27 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
This has two significant drawbacks. First the main loop hangs util an
I/O request is completed and secondly if the I/O request does not
co
On 10/12/2015 08:27 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
> This has two significant drawbacks. First the main loop hangs util an
> I/O request is completed and secondly if the I/O request does not
> complete (e.g. due to an unresponsive
Am 22.10.2015 um 18:17 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:27:22PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> @@ -129,9 +134,71 @@ static int cd_read_sector(IDEState *s, int lba, uint8_t
>> *buf, int sector_size)
>> ret = -EIO;
>> break;
>> }
>> +
>> +if (!ret) {
>>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:27:22PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> @@ -129,9 +134,71 @@ static int cd_read_sector(IDEState *s, int lba, uint8_t
> *buf, int sector_size)
> ret = -EIO;
> break;
> }
> +
> +if (!ret) {
> +s->lba++;
This function probably shouldn't take
PIO read requests on the ATAPI interface used to be sync blk requests.
This has two significant drawbacks. First the main loop hangs util an
I/O request is completed and secondly if the I/O request does not
complete (e.g. due to an unresponsive storage) Qemu hangs completely.
Signed-off-by: Peter
