On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 01:20:55PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 January 2012 07:37, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> > use int64 when compare two time
> >
> > int32 only represent only 136 years when comparing two times based on
> > second. It would be better to use int64.
>
> "int32", "int32_t" and
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Färber [mailto:afaer...@suse.de]
> Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 1:44 AM
> > use int64 when compare two time
> >
> > int32 only represent only 136 years when comparing two times based on
> second. It would be better to use int64.
>
> int32 and int64
Am 06.01.2012 08:37, schrieb Zhang, Yang Z:
> use int64 when compare two time
>
> int32 only represent only 136 years when comparing two times based on second.
> It would be better to use int64.
int32 and int64 are softfloat types and should not be used here.
Do you have an actual use case that
On 6 January 2012 07:37, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> use int64 when compare two time
>
> int32 only represent only 136 years when comparing two times based on second.
> It would be better to use int64.
"int32", "int32_t" and "'int' which happens to be 32 bit" are all
different types;
your changelog m
use int64 when compare two time
int32 only represent only 136 years when comparing two times based on second.
It would be better to use int64.
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang
diff --git a/qemu-common.h b/qemu-common.h
index b2de015..c14f506 100644
--- a/qemu-common.h
+++ b/qemu-common.h
@@ -116,8 +1
