On 11.10.2012, at 15:36, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On 21 August 2012 16:47, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> +#define TARGET_FS_IOC_GETFLAGS TARGET_IORU('f', 1)
>>
>> This and the SETFLAGS one in the next patch fail the consistency
>> check that an x86_64-on-x86_64 linux-user binary perfo
Hi Alexander,
On 21 August 2012 16:47, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> +#define TARGET_FS_IOC_GETFLAGS TARGET_IORU('f', 1)
>
> This and the SETFLAGS one in the next patch fail the consistency
> check that an x86_64-on-x86_64 linux-user binary performs:
>
> cam-vm-266:precise:qemu$ ./x86_64-linux-user/qem
On 21 August 2012 13:43, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
> ---
> linux-user/ioctls.h |1 +
> linux-user/syscall_defs.h |2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/ioctls.h b/linux-user/ioctls.h
> index bb76c56..1b798b3
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
---
linux-user/ioctls.h |1 +
linux-user/syscall_defs.h |2 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/ioctls.h b/linux-user/ioctls.h
index bb76c56..1b798b3 100644
--- a/linux-user/ioctls.h
+++ b/linux-user/ioctls.h
@@
