On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 10.08.2012 05:16, schrieb Peter A. G. Crosthwaite:
>> From: Anthony Liguori
>>
>> The current implementation of Interfaces is poorly designed. Each interface
>> that an object implements ends up being an object that's tracked by the
>>
Am 10.08.2012 05:16, schrieb Peter A. G. Crosthwaite:
> From: Anthony Liguori
>
> The current implementation of Interfaces is poorly designed. Each interface
> that an object implements ends up being an object that's tracked by the
> implementing object. There's all sorts of gymnastics to deal
From: Anthony Liguori
The current implementation of Interfaces is poorly designed. Each interface
that an object implements ends up being an object that's tracked by the
implementing object. There's all sorts of gymnastics to deal with casting
between these objects.
But an interface shouldn't
From: Anthony Liguori
The current implementation of Interfaces is poorly designed. Each interface
that an object implements ends up being an object that's tracked by the
implementing object. There's all sorts of gymnastics to deal with casting
between these objects.
But an interface shouldn't
Il 08/08/2012 01:46, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
> Hi All,
>
> We seem to be having difficulty getting a review/merge on this patch. I
> have sent two series, two pings and a PULL, with only a single reply
> from P. Maydell asking for other reviewers to weigh in:
>
> - on July 17 P. May
Hi All,
We seem to be having difficulty getting a review/merge on this patch. I
have sent two series, two pings and a PULL, with only a single reply
from P. Maydell asking for other reviewers to weigh in:
- on July 17 P. Maydell wrote ---
I guess I should mention that I'm assumin
From: Anthony Liguori
The current implementation of Interfaces is poorly designed. Each interface
that an object implements ends up being an object that's tracked by the
implementing object. There's all sorts of gymnastics to deal with casting
between these objects.
But an interface shouldn't
