On 06/11/2015 11:35 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Patch looks good to me, but it made me wonder about something. Please
> find the question inline.
>
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> We require a C99 compiler, so let's use 'bool' instead of 'int'
>> when dealing with boolean values. There are few en
Patch looks good to me, but it made me wonder about something. Please
find the question inline.
Eric Blake writes:
> We require a C99 compiler, so let's use 'bool' instead of 'int'
> when dealing with boolean values. There are few enough clients
> to fix them all in one pass.
>
> Signed-off-by
On Sat 16 May 2015 12:24:59 AM CEST, Eric Blake wrote:
> We require a C99 compiler, so let's use 'bool' instead of 'int'
> when dealing with boolean values. There are few enough clients
> to fix them all in one pass.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia
Berto
Eric Blake writes:
> On 05/16/2015 07:30 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 16.05.2015 um 00:24 schrieb Eric Blake:
>>> We require a C99 compiler, so let's use 'bool' instead of 'int'
>>> when dealing with boolean values. There are few enough clients
>>> to fix them all in one pass.
>>>
>>> Signed-
On 05/16/2015 07:30 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 16.05.2015 um 00:24 schrieb Eric Blake:
>> We require a C99 compiler, so let's use 'bool' instead of 'int'
>> when dealing with boolean values. There are few enough clients
>> to fix them all in one pass.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
>> ---
>
Am 16.05.2015 um 00:24 schrieb Eric Blake:
> We require a C99 compiler, so let's use 'bool' instead of 'int'
> when dealing with boolean values. There are few enough clients
> to fix them all in one pass.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
> ---
> block/qapi.c| 2 +-
> block/quo
We require a C99 compiler, so let's use 'bool' instead of 'int'
when dealing with boolean values. There are few enough clients
to fix them all in one pass.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
---
block/qapi.c| 2 +-
block/quorum.c | 4 ++--
block/vvfat.c
