On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 18.05.2015 um 18:44 schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> On 05/17/2015 12:51 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
@@ -1208,7 +1203,6 @@ static void monitor_printc(Monitor *mon, int c)
>
Am 18.05.2015 um 18:44 schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 05/17/2015 12:51 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>>> @@ -1208,7 +1203,6 @@ static void monitor_printc(Monitor *mon, int c)
>>> static void memory_dump(Monitor *mon, int count, int form
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 05/17/2015 12:51 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> @@ -1208,7 +1203,6 @@ static void monitor_printc(Monitor *mon, int c)
>> static void memory_dump(Monitor *mon, int count, int format, int wsize,
>> hwaddr addr,
On 05/17/2015 12:51 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> @@ -1208,7 +1203,6 @@ static void monitor_printc(Monitor *mon, int c)
> static void memory_dump(Monitor *mon, int count, int format, int wsize,
> hwaddr addr, int is_physical)
> {
> -CPUArchState *env;
> int l, l
The monitor currently has one helper, mon_get_cpu() which will return
an env pointer. The target specific users of this API want an env, but
all the target agnostic users really just want the cpu pointer. These
users then need to use the target-specifically defined ENV_GET_CPU to
navigate back up t
