Am 28.03.2014 um 15:22 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> Initialize the dbs->in_cancel flag in dma_bdrv_io(), since qemu_aio_get()
> does not return zero-initialized memory. Spotted by the clang sanitizer
> (which complained when the value loaded in dma_complete() was not valid
> for a bool type); t
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:22:49PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Initialize the dbs->in_cancel flag in dma_bdrv_io(), since qemu_aio_get()
> does not return zero-initialized memory. Spotted by the clang sanitizer
> (which complained when the value loaded in dma_complete() was not valid
> for a bool
On 28 March 2014 14:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Initialize the dbs->in_cancel flag in dma_bdrv_io(), since qemu_aio_get()
> does not return zero-initialized memory. Spotted by the clang sanitizer
> (which complained when the value loaded in dma_complete() was not valid
> for a bool type); this migh
On 28 March 2014 14:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Initialize the dbs->in_cancel flag in dma_bdrv_io(), since qemu_aio_get()
> does not return zero-initialized memory. Spotted by the clang sanitizer
> (which complained when the value loaded in dma_complete() was not valid
> for a bool type); this migh
Initialize the dbs->in_cancel flag in dma_bdrv_io(), since qemu_aio_get()
does not return zero-initialized memory. Spotted by the clang sanitizer
(which complained when the value loaded in dma_complete() was not valid
for a bool type); this might have resulted in leaking the AIO block.
Signed-off-
