Wei Yang wrote:
> Since we will not operate on the next address pointed by out, it is not
> necessary to do addition on it.
>
> After removing the operation, the function size reduced 16/18 bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela
Included. I agree with David that the com
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 06:49:54PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>* Wei Yang (richardw.y...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
>> Since we will not operate on the next address pointed by out, it is not
>> necessary to do addition on it.
>>
>> After removing the operation, the function size reduced 16/
* Wei Yang (richardw.y...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> Since we will not operate on the next address pointed by out, it is not
> necessary to do addition on it.
>
> After removing the operation, the function size reduced 16/18 bytes.
For me with a -O3 it didn't make any difference - the compiler was
Since we will not operate on the next address pointed by out, it is not
necessary to do addition on it.
After removing the operation, the function size reduced 16/18 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
---
util/cutils.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/util
