On 23 May 2012 15:41, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 23.05.2012 14:44, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 20 May 2012 10:02, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> There can be only one fw_cfg device, so saving global reference to it
>>> removes the need to pass its pointer around.
>>
>> This seems like a backwards step
Am 23.05.2012 14:44, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 20 May 2012 10:02, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> There can be only one fw_cfg device, so saving global reference to it
>> removes the need to pass its pointer around.
>
> This seems like a backwards step to me: one of the things that prevents
> us support
On 05/23/2012 08:32 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:25:35AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/23/2012 07:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Ping.
I don't understand why you're pinging.. The patch has just been on
the list for a couple of days and is definitely not a 1.1 candidat
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:25:35AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 07:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >Ping.
>
> I don't understand why you're pinging.. The patch has just been on
> the list for a couple of days and is definitely not a 1.1 candidate.
> Am I missing something?
>
It is
On 05/23/2012 07:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Ping.
I don't understand why you're pinging.. The patch has just been on the list for
a couple of days and is definitely not a 1.1 candidate. Am I missing something?
However...
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:02:40PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
The
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:44:45PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 20 May 2012 10:02, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > There can be only one fw_cfg device, so saving global reference to it
> > removes the need to pass its pointer around.
>
> This seems like a backwards step to me: one of the things that
On 20 May 2012 10:02, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> There can be only one fw_cfg device, so saving global reference to it
> removes the need to pass its pointer around.
This seems like a backwards step to me: one of the things that prevents
us supporting "two separate machines in one emulation" is that w
Ping.
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:02:40PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> There can be only one fw_cfg device, so saving global reference to it
> removes the need to pass its pointer around.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov
> ---
> hw/fw_cfg.c | 110
> +++-
There can be only one fw_cfg device, so saving global reference to it
removes the need to pass its pointer around.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov
---
hw/fw_cfg.c | 110 +++--
hw/fw_cfg.h | 15 +++
hw/loader.c | 10 +
hw/
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> There can be only one fw_cfg device, so saving global reference to it
> removes the need to pass its pointer around.
>From OO point of view this is not so great, but ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov
> ---
> hw/fw_cfg.c | 106
>
There can be only one fw_cfg device, so saving global reference to it
removes the need to pass its pointer around.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov
---
hw/fw_cfg.c | 106 ++---
hw/fw_cfg.h | 15 +++
hw/loader.c | 10 +
hw/
11 matches
Mail list logo
