On 02/27/2017 11:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:19:56PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> From: Anton Nefedov
>>
>> According to RFC7230 Section 3.2, header field name is case-insensitive.
>>
>> The haystack string length is limited by 4096 bytes by
>> qio_channel_webs
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:19:56PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> From: Anton Nefedov
>
> According to RFC7230 Section 3.2, header field name is case-insensitive.
>
> The haystack string length is limited by 4096 bytes by
> qio_channel_websock_handshake_read().
>
> Further, handshake_process()
On 01/30/2017 06:47 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> What is #PSBM-57554 referring to ? Is that some custom bug tracker
> you have ? I'm going to drop that unless its something we need to
> keep
it must be dropped. Sorry, this is my mistake.
Den
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:19:56PM +0300, Denis
What is #PSBM-57554 referring to ? Is that some custom bug tracker
you have ? I'm going to drop that unless its something we need to
keep
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:19:56PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> From: Anton Nefedov
>
> According to RFC7230 Section 3.2, header field name is case-insensi
From: Anton Nefedov
According to RFC7230 Section 3.2, header field name is case-insensitive.
The haystack string length is limited by 4096 bytes by
qio_channel_websock_handshake_read().
Further, handshake_process() dups and NULL-terminates the string
so it is safe to call non length-limited fun
