Il 29/09/2012 13:28, Blue Swirl ha scritto:
>> > +if (node->pfd.fd == fd)
> Forgot to run checkpatch.pl?
>
No, just ignored its result for an RFC.
Paolo
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> This adds a GPollFD to each AioHandler. It will then be possible to
> attach these GPollFDs to a GSource, and from there to the main loop.
> aio_wait examines the GPollFDs and avoids calling select() if any
> is set (similar to what it does
Il 26/09/2012 00:01, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
> > +revents = node->pfd.revents & node->pfd.events;
> > +node->pfd.revents &= ~revents;
>
> This is interesting and I must admit I don't understand why it's
> necessary. What case are you trying to handle?
That's for the case wher
Il 26/09/2012 00:01, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>> > +node->pfd.events = G_IO_ERR;
>> > +node->pfd.events |= (io_read ? G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP : 0);
>> > +node->pfd.events |= (io_write ? G_IO_OUT : 0);
>> > }
> Should we even set G_IO_ERR? I think that corresponds to exce
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> This adds a GPollFD to each AioHandler. It will then be possible to
> attach these GPollFDs to a GSource, and from there to the main loop.
> aio_wait examines the GPollFDs and avoids calling select() if any
> is set (similar to what it does if bottom halves are available)
This adds a GPollFD to each AioHandler. It will then be possible to
attach these GPollFDs to a GSource, and from there to the main loop.
aio_wait examines the GPollFDs and avoids calling select() if any
is set (similar to what it does if bottom halves are available).
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
