On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 02.07.2011 um 11:04 schrieb Blue Swirl:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:06 AM, malc wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:51 AM, malc wrote:
>
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Blue Swirl wro
Am 02.07.2011 um 11:04 schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:06 AM, malc wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:51 AM, malc wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Blue Swirl wrote:
Use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_R1 etc. for consistency.
This i'd
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:06 AM, malc wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:51 AM, malc wrote:
>> > On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >
>> >> Use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_R1 etc. for consistency.
>> >>
>> >
>> > This i'd rather avoid.
>
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:51 AM, malc wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >
> >> Use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_R1 etc. for consistency.
> >>
> >
> > This i'd rather avoid.
>
> Why? In addition to the consistency among targets, a
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:51 AM, malc wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
>> Use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_R1 etc. for consistency.
>>
>
> This i'd rather avoid.
Why? In addition to the consistency among targets, a magic constant is
replaced with a symbol which improves
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_R1 etc. for consistency.
>
This i'd rather avoid.
[..snip..]
--
mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
Use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_R1 etc. for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl
---
tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c | 18 +++---
tcg/ppc64/tcg-target.c | 16 +---
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c b/tcg/ppc/tcg-t
