On 2015-03-18 at 15:51, John Snow wrote:
On 03/18/2015 09:41 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2015-03-17 at 19:27, John Snow wrote:
On 03/17/2015 03:49 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2015-03-04 at 23:15, John Snow wrote:
This patch actually implements the transactional callback system
for the drive_backu
On 03/18/2015 09:41 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2015-03-17 at 19:27, John Snow wrote:
On 03/17/2015 03:49 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2015-03-04 at 23:15, John Snow wrote:
This patch actually implements the transactional callback system
for the drive_backup transaction.
(1) We manually pick up a
On 2015-03-17 at 19:27, John Snow wrote:
On 03/17/2015 03:49 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2015-03-04 at 23:15, John Snow wrote:
This patch actually implements the transactional callback system
for the drive_backup transaction.
(1) We manually pick up a reference to the bitmap if present to allow
On 03/17/2015 03:49 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2015-03-04 at 23:15, John Snow wrote:
This patch actually implements the transactional callback system
for the drive_backup transaction.
(1) We manually pick up a reference to the bitmap if present to allow
its cleanup to be delayed until after
On 2015-03-04 at 23:15, John Snow wrote:
This patch actually implements the transactional callback system
for the drive_backup transaction.
(1) We manually pick up a reference to the bitmap if present to allow
its cleanup to be delayed until after all drive_backup jobs launched
by the
This patch actually implements the transactional callback system
for the drive_backup transaction.
(1) We manually pick up a reference to the bitmap if present to allow
its cleanup to be delayed until after all drive_backup jobs launched
by the transaction have fully completed.
(2) We cre
