On 07/31/2012 04:50 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 31/07/2012 10:47, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>> Why did you convert the initialisation to separate statement? If you
>> really want to do this, I think using g_new0 would be safer now, but I
>> actually like compound literals better.
>>
Il 31/07/2012 10:47, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>>> >> Why did you convert the initialisation to separate statement? If you
>>> >> really want to do this, I think using g_new0 would be safer now, but I
>>> >> actually like compound literals better.
>> >
>> > Later on I will have some more initializati
Am 30.07.2012 17:05, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 30/07/2012 16:47, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
+BlockJobInfo *block_job_query(BlockJob *job)
+{
+BlockJobInfo *info = g_new(BlockJobInfo, 1);
+info->type = g_strdup(job->job_type->job_type);
+info->device = g_strdup(b
Il 30/07/2012 16:47, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>> > +BlockJobInfo *block_job_query(BlockJob *job)
>> > +{
>> > +BlockJobInfo *info = g_new(BlockJobInfo, 1);
>> > +info->type = g_strdup(job->job_type->job_type);
>> > +info->device = g_strdup(bdrv_get_device_name(job->bs));
>> > +info-
Am 24.07.2012 13:03, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Extract it out of the implementation of query-block-jobs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> blockdev.c | 15 ++-
> blockjob.c | 11 +++
> blockjob.h |8
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Extract it out of the implementation of query-block-jobs.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
blockdev.c | 15 ++-
blockjob.c | 11 +++
blockjob.h |8
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
index e066f8f..dc099f9
