On 2013-04-23 18:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 23/04/2013 18:13, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>> Il 23/04/2013 10:47, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
> if (val & LSI_ISTAT0_SRST) {
> -lsi_soft_reset(s);
> +qdev_reset_all(&s->dev.qdev);
>>> What should ensure that al
Il 23/04/2013 18:13, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> Il 23/04/2013 10:47, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
if (val & LSI_ISTAT0_SRST) {
-lsi_soft_reset(s);
+qdev_reset_all(&s->dev.qdev);
>> What should ensure that all device resets are performed before the host
>>
Il 23/04/2013 10:47, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>> > if (val & LSI_ISTAT0_SRST) {
>> > -lsi_soft_reset(s);
>> > +qdev_reset_all(&s->dev.qdev);
> What should ensure that all device resets are performed before the host
> reset? I'm asking as we just ran into the assert(!s
On 2012-07-27 17:02, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> By first resetting the devices, lsi_soft_reset will find the queue
> already cleared so there is no need to do that forcibly (which may also
> leak SCSIRequests, and/or worse due to dangling references to the
> lsi_request in the hba_private field).
>
>
By first resetting the devices, lsi_soft_reset will find the queue
already cleared so there is no need to do that forcibly (which may also
leak SCSIRequests, and/or worse due to dangling references to the
lsi_request in the hba_private field).
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
hw/lsi53c895a.c |
