On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:27:46AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 09:01:17AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 04:56:08PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> > > From: Bharata B Rao
> > >
> > > Use float64 argument instead of unit64_t in helper_compute_fp
David Gibson writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 04:56:08PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> From: Bharata B Rao
>>
>> Use float64 argument instead of unit64_t in helper_compute_fprf()
>> This allows code in helper_compute_fprf() to be reused later to
>> work with
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 09:01:17AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 04:56:08PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> > From: Bharata B Rao
> >
> > Use float64 argument instead of unit64_t in helper_compute_fprf()
> > This allows code in helper_compute_fprf() to be reused later to
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 04:56:08PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> From: Bharata B Rao
>
> Use float64 argument instead of unit64_t in helper_compute_fprf()
> This allows code in helper_compute_fprf() to be reused later to
> work with float128 argument too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao
>
From: Bharata B Rao
Use float64 argument instead of unit64_t in helper_compute_fprf()
This allows code in helper_compute_fprf() to be reused later to
work with float128 argument too.
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao
Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania
---
target-ppc/fpu_helper.c | 16 +++
