On 04/13/2017 05:19 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 13.04.2017 02:40, John Snow wrote:
>>
>> On 04/12/2017 07:36 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> On 04/12/2017 05:47 PM, John Snow wrote:
On 04/12/2017 01:49 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> We had several functions that no one was using, a
13.04.2017 02:40, John Snow wrote:
On 04/12/2017 07:36 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/12/2017 05:47 PM, John Snow wrote:
On 04/12/2017 01:49 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
We had several functions that no one was using, and which used
sector-based interfaces. I'm trying to convert towards byte-based
in
On 04/12/2017 07:36 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/12/2017 05:47 PM, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/12/2017 01:49 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> We had several functions that no one was using, and which used
>>> sector-based interfaces. I'm trying to convert towards byte-based
>>> interfaces, so it's
On 04/12/2017 05:47 PM, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 04/12/2017 01:49 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> We had several functions that no one was using, and which used
>> sector-based interfaces. I'm trying to convert towards byte-based
>> interfaces, so it's easier to just drop the unused functions:
>>
>> b
On 04/12/2017 01:49 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> We had several functions that no one was using, and which used
> sector-based interfaces. I'm trying to convert towards byte-based
> interfaces, so it's easier to just drop the unused functions:
>
> bdrv_dirty_bitmap_size
> bdrv_dirty_bitmap_get_meta
We had several functions that no one was using, and which used
sector-based interfaces. I'm trying to convert towards byte-based
interfaces, so it's easier to just drop the unused functions:
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_size
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_get_meta
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_reset_meta
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_meta_gran
