On 28/08/2015 16:53, Frederic Konrad wrote:
>> After this commit it looks like we have no users of spinlock_t
>> at all. It would be good to have a followup patch which deleted
>> include/exec/spinlock.h.
>
> Seems Paolo forget to pick up the following patch from the mttcg tree:
> "remove unused
On 28/08/2015 16:49, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 12 August 2015 at 17:40, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
From: KONRAD Frederic
spinlock is only used in two cases:
* cpu-exec.c: to protect TranslationBlock
* mem_helper.c: for lock helper in target-i386 (which seems broken).
It's a pthread_mutex_t in
On 12 August 2015 at 17:40, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: KONRAD Frederic
>
> spinlock is only used in two cases:
> * cpu-exec.c: to protect TranslationBlock
> * mem_helper.c: for lock helper in target-i386 (which seems broken).
>
> It's a pthread_mutex_t in user-mode so better using QemuMutex
On 13/08/2015 15:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 13/08/2015 14:17, Frederic Konrad wrote:
diff --git a/linux-user/main.c b/linux-user/main.c
index fdee981..fd06ce9 100644
--- a/linux-user/main.c
+++ b/linux-user/main.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int pending_cpus;
/* Make sure everything is in a
On 13/08/2015 14:17, Frederic Konrad wrote:
>> diff --git a/linux-user/main.c b/linux-user/main.c
>> index fdee981..fd06ce9 100644
>> --- a/linux-user/main.c
>> +++ b/linux-user/main.c
>> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int pending_cpus;
>> /* Make sure everything is in a consistent state for callin
On 12/08/2015 18:40, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
From: KONRAD Frederic
spinlock is only used in two cases:
* cpu-exec.c: to protect TranslationBlock
* mem_helper.c: for lock helper in target-i386 (which seems broken).
It's a pthread_mutex_t in user-mode so better using QemuMutex directly in thi
From: KONRAD Frederic
spinlock is only used in two cases:
* cpu-exec.c: to protect TranslationBlock
* mem_helper.c: for lock helper in target-i386 (which seems broken).
It's a pthread_mutex_t in user-mode so better using QemuMutex directly in this
case.
It allows as well to reuse tb_lock mut
