Am 03.05.2016 um 12:49 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 02.05.2016 17:35, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 26.04.2016 um 23:32 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> >> If the backing file is overridden, this most probably does change the
> >> guest-visible data of a BDS. Therefore, we will need to consider this in
>
On 02.05.2016 17:35, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 26.04.2016 um 23:32 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> If the backing file is overridden, this most probably does change the
>> guest-visible data of a BDS. Therefore, we will need to consider this in
>> bdrv_refresh_filename().
>>
>> Adding a new field to the
Am 26.04.2016 um 23:32 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> If the backing file is overridden, this most probably does change the
> guest-visible data of a BDS. Therefore, we will need to consider this in
> bdrv_refresh_filename().
>
> Adding a new field to the BDS is not nice, but it is very simple and
>
On 04/26/2016 03:32 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> If the backing file is overridden, this most probably does change the
> guest-visible data of a BDS. Therefore, we will need to consider this in
> bdrv_refresh_filename().
>
> Adding a new field to the BDS is not nice, but it is very simple and
> exactly
If the backing file is overridden, this most probably does change the
guest-visible data of a BDS. Therefore, we will need to consider this in
bdrv_refresh_filename().
Adding a new field to the BDS is not nice, but it is very simple and
exactly keeps track of whether the backing file has been over
