On 14 May 2012 11:34, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 May 2012 23:57, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> I'm aware this series predates the QOM era, but I'm not really happy how
>> this aligns with my CPUState overhaul. Independent of what needs to be
>> fixed for cpu_copy(), I would like to see new non-TCG f
On 13 May 2012 23:57, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 15.04.2012 15:45, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> Initial infrastructure for data-driven registration of
>> coprocessor register implementations.
>>
>> We still fall back to the old-style switch statements pending
>> complete conversion of all existing re
Am 15.04.2012 15:45, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> Initial infrastructure for data-driven registration of
> coprocessor register implementations.
>
> We still fall back to the old-style switch statements pending
> complete conversion of all existing registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
> ---
>
Initial infrastructure for data-driven registration of
coprocessor register implementations.
We still fall back to the old-style switch statements pending
complete conversion of all existing registers.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
---
target-arm/cpu.c | 34
target-arm/cpu.h
