On 11/19/2010 07:28 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:44:34PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>
>> qemu_malloc doesn't check for zero argument, so we need to
>> check ourselves.
>
> I'm not sure if it's a that good idea to remove the implicit
> ->sg != NULL assumption. Any
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:44:34PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>
> qemu_malloc doesn't check for zero argument, so we need to
> check ourselves.
I'm not sure if it's a that good idea to remove the implicit
->sg != NULL assumption. Any reason you can't simply call
qemu_sglist_init later?
qemu_malloc doesn't check for zero argument, so we need to
check ourselves.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
dma-helpers.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dma-helpers.c b/dma-helpers.c
index 712ed89..877b2c3 100644
--- a/dma-helpers.c
+++ b/dma-hel
