On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 16:14 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> diff --git a/hw/qdev-dma.h b/hw/qdev-dma.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..f0ff558
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/hw/qdev-dma.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Support for dma_addr_t typed properties
> > + *
> > + * Copyrig
On 20 June 2012 23:59, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/20/2012 05:26 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 20 June 2012 22:14, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> ...for that matter weren't we tossing around the idea of just
>> making target_phys_addr_t 64 bits for everything? (I actually
>> want to do this for ta
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:29:23AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 16:14 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> > Why not make life easy and fix dma_addr_t to 64-bit?
>
> No opinion on my side, that's from the original patch series, I suppose
> the goal was to avoid the ov
On 06/20/2012 05:26 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 20 June 2012 22:14, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Why not make life easy and fix dma_addr_t to 64-bit?
...for that matter weren't we tossing around the idea of just
making target_phys_addr_t 64 bits for everything? (I actually
want to do this for targe
On 20 June 2012 22:14, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Why not make life easy and fix dma_addr_t to 64-bit?
...for that matter weren't we tossing around the idea of just
making target_phys_addr_t 64 bits for everything? (I actually
want to do this for target-arm anyway; last time I did some
quick smoke-
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 16:14 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Why not make life easy and fix dma_addr_t to 64-bit?
No opinion on my side, that's from the original patch series, I suppose
the goal was to avoid the overhead/bloat on 32-bit only
platforms/targets.
Cheers,
Ben.
On 06/19/2012 01:39 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
From: David Gibson
A while back, we introduced the dma_addr_t type, which is supposed to
be used for bus visible memory addresses. At present, this is an
alias for target_phys_addr_t, but this will change when we eventually
add support for g
From: David Gibson
A while back, we introduced the dma_addr_t type, which is supposed to
be used for bus visible memory addresses. At present, this is an
alias for target_phys_addr_t, but this will change when we eventually
add support for guest visible IOMMUs.
There are some instances of targe
From: David Gibson
A while back, we introduced the dma_addr_t type, which is supposed to
be used for bus visible memory addresses. At present, this is an
alias for target_phys_addr_t, but this will change when we eventually
add support for guest visible IOMMUs.
There are some instances of targe
A while back, we introduced the dma_addr_t type, which is supposed to
be used for bus visible memory addresses. At present, this is an
alias for target_phys_addr_t, but this will change when we eventually
add support for guest visible IOMMUs.
There are some instances of target_phys_addr_t in the
10 matches
Mail list logo
