Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] blockjob: remove unnecessary check

2017-05-09 Thread Jeff Cody
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 04:13:00PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > !job is always checked prior to the call, drop it from here. > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > --- > blockjob.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/blockjob.c b

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] blockjob: remove unnecessary check

2017-05-08 Thread Paolo Bonzini
!job is always checked prior to the call, drop it from here. Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- blockjob.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/blockjob.c b/blockjob.c index 6e489327ff..23022b3331 100644 --- a/blockjob.c +++ b/blockjob.c

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] blockjob: remove unnecessary check

2017-04-26 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 25/04/2017 01:19, John Snow wrote: > Worth a resend to CC qemu-block, include a cover letter, and all the > usual amenities? The cover letter was there, but yes, I'll ensure Jeff and qemu-block are CCed on all patches. Paolo

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] blockjob: remove unnecessary check

2017-04-24 Thread John Snow
Worth a resend to CC qemu-block, include a cover letter, and all the usual amenities? On 04/19/2017 10:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > !job is always checked prior to the call, drop it from here. > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > --- > blockjob.c | 2 +- > 1 file

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] blockjob: remove unnecessary check

2017-04-19 Thread Eric Blake
On 04/19/2017 11:12 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 19/04/2017 17:48, Eric Blake wrote: >>> bool block_job_user_paused(BlockJob *job) >>> { >> Is it worth using some form of attribute((nonnull)) annotations on >> various functions, to both state our intentions and let compilers help >> us cat

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] blockjob: remove unnecessary check

2017-04-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 19/04/2017 17:48, Eric Blake wrote: >> bool block_job_user_paused(BlockJob *job) >> { > Is it worth using some form of attribute((nonnull)) annotations on > various functions, to both state our intentions and let compilers help > us catch obvious places where we are violating our intentions?

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] blockjob: remove unnecessary check

2017-04-19 Thread Eric Blake
On 04/19/2017 09:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > !job is always checked prior to the call, drop it from here. > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > --- > blockjob.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/blockjob.c b/blockjob.c > inde

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] blockjob: remove unnecessary check

2017-04-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
!job is always checked prior to the call, drop it from here. Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- blockjob.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/blockjob.c b/blockjob.c index 6e48932..23022b3 100644 --- a/blockjob.c +++ b/blockjob.c @@ -4