On 2013-02-11 09:05, Andreas Färber wrote:
We have it enabled for openSUSE despite the #warning (anyone can enable
it via --target-list, so it's not entirely dead code), but since you're
fixing it later in the series that seems fine with me. Ideally you could
squash patches 1+2 so that there is n
Am 11.02.2013 17:02, schrieb Richard Henderson:
> On 2013-02-10 10:30, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
>
> Deleting these first makes the next patch much easier to read.
> This doesn't cause any sort of compilation failure because we
> have not yet enabled n32/n64 com
On 11 February 2013 16:02, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2013-02-10 10:30, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
>
>
> Deleting these first makes the next patch much easier to read.
> This doesn't cause any sort of compilation failure because we
> have not yet enabled n3
On 2013-02-10 10:30, Richard Henderson wrote:
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
Deleting these first makes the next patch much easier to read.
This doesn't cause any sort of compilation failure because we
have not yet enabled n32/n64 compilation. This is dead code.
r~
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
linux-user/signal.c | 58 -
1 file changed, 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/signal.c b/linux-user/signal.c
index 67c2311..b2f1d29 100644
--- a/linux-user/signal.c
+++ b/linux-user/signal.c
@@ -2438,6
