On 18 December 2012 12:44, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>> We really need a better way to mark devices as "obsolete, will be
>> removed/broken/etc in a future version"...
>
> Yes, we do.
>
> These devices, however, are a slightly different case: "need
> maintenance, will be re
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 17 December 2012 14:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> The writing has been on the wall for a few years.
>
> ...behind a filing cabinet in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door
> saying "beware of the leopard"?
>
> We really need a better way to mark devices as "obso
Andreas Färber writes:
> Am 17.12.2012 15:43, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
>> Alexander Graf writes:
>>
>>> On 17.12.2012, at 15:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>
They complicate IDE data structures and keep getting in the way.
Also, TRIM support (commit d353fb72) is broken for them, bec
On 17 December 2012 14:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> The writing has been on the wall for a few years.
...behind a filing cabinet in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door
saying "beware of the leopard"?
We really need a better way to mark devices as "obsolete, will be
removed/broken/etc in
Am 17.12.2012 15:43, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> Alexander Graf writes:
>
>> On 17.12.2012, at 15:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>>> They complicate IDE data structures and keep getting in the way.
>>> Also, TRIM support (commit d353fb72) is broken for them, because
>>> ide_identify() accesses
Alexander Graf writes:
> On 17.12.2012, at 16:15, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Alexander Graf writes:
>>
>>> On 17.12.2012, at 15:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>
Alexander Graf writes:
> On 17.12.2012, at 15:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> They complicate IDE data
Alexander Graf writes:
> On 17.12.2012, at 15:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> They complicate IDE data structures and keep getting in the way.
>> Also, TRIM support (commit d353fb72) is broken for them, because
>> ide_identify() accesses IDEDevice member conf, but IDEDevice exists
>> only with
On 17.12.2012, at 16:15, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Alexander Graf writes:
>
>> On 17.12.2012, at 15:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>>> Alexander Graf writes:
>>>
On 17.12.2012, at 15:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> They complicate IDE data structures and keep getting in the w
Alexander Graf writes:
> On 17.12.2012, at 15:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Alexander Graf writes:
>>
>>> On 17.12.2012, at 15:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>
They complicate IDE data structures and keep getting in the way.
Also, TRIM support (commit d353fb72) is broken for them
On 17.12.2012, at 15:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Alexander Graf writes:
>
>> On 17.12.2012, at 15:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>>> They complicate IDE data structures and keep getting in the way.
>>> Also, TRIM support (commit d353fb72) is broken for them, because
>>> ide_identify() acce
They complicate IDE data structures and keep getting in the way.
Also, TRIM support (commit d353fb72) is broken for them, because
ide_identify() accesses IDEDevice member conf, but IDEDevice exists
only with qdevified controllers.
The non-qdevified controllers are still there, but attempting to
co
On 17.12.2012, at 15:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> They complicate IDE data structures and keep getting in the way.
> Also, TRIM support (commit d353fb72) is broken for them, because
> ide_identify() accesses IDEDevice member conf, but IDEDevice exists
> only with qdevified controllers.
>
> The
12 matches
Mail list logo
