On 04/21/2011 07:48 AM, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:43 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> On Apr 21, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Brian Wheeler wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:31 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Apr 20, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:43 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Brian Wheeler wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:31 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> >> On Apr 20, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 04/20/2011 08:46 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
On Apr 21, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:31 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> On Apr 20, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/20/2011 08:46 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
Right, but you could create an ev67 machine with a single PCI
con
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:31 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> > On 04/20/2011 08:46 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> >> Right, but you could create an ev67 machine with a single PCI
> >> controller (or put all the devices on the same PCI controll
On Apr 20, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/20/2011 08:46 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> Right, but you could create an ev67 machine with a single PCI
>> controller (or put all the devices on the same PCI controller).
>
> Even the lowly ds10 has two hoses.
>
> I'll admit I hadn
On 04/20/2011 08:46 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Right, but you could create an ev67 machine with a single PCI
> controller (or put all the devices on the same PCI controller).
Even the lowly ds10 has two hoses.
I'll admit I hadn't considered engineering the second hose to
be "present" but always
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/20/2011 02:06 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> * sx164 is ev56 based, isn't it ? It would be nice if cpu version specific
>> code is clearly marked.
>
> Yes, but most importantly it is the most evolved of the single hose systems.
> QEM
On 04/20/2011 02:06 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> * sx164 is ev56 based, isn't it ? It would be nice if cpu version specific
> code is clearly marked.
Yes, but most importantly it is the most evolved of the single hose systems.
QEMU is nowhere near ready to deal with multiple PCI host controllers
I'd like to second Tristan in saying that I'm glad someone is working on
alpha system emulation -- its long overdue!
Brian
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 11:06 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> > Changes from v1 to v2:
> > - Split patch 5 up into
On Apr 19, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Changes from v1 to v2:
> - Split patch 5 up into little pieces. These pieces were compile
>tested by applying patch 23 (Enable alpha-softmmu) out of sequence
>so that both softmmu and linux-user targets were built. But in
>the
Changes from v1 to v2:
- Split patch 5 up into little pieces. These pieces were compile
tested by applying patch 23 (Enable alpha-softmmu) out of sequence
so that both softmmu and linux-user targets were built. But in
the end I chickened out and re-ordered the enable patch to last.
11 matches
Mail list logo
