On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 08:44 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 15:34 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> This series doesn't build for me. I get dependency errors even after a
> >> full rebuild. I'm building from a separate directory fwiw.
> >>
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 15:34 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This series doesn't build for me. I get dependency errors even after a
full rebuild. I'm building from a separate directory fwiw.
Don't see it here, I'm afraid - any more details?
Btw, it's all pushed t
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 15:34 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Hey,
> > We've been meaning to split net.c up for quite a while now,
> > so here goes with a first cut at.
> >
> > There shouldn't be anything too controversial here, apart
> > from CONFIG_LINUX m
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey,
We've been meaning to split net.c up for quite a while now,
so here goes with a first cut at.
There shouldn't be anything too controversial here, apart
from CONFIG_LINUX maybe.
I've build tested this on F11, F12 and mingw and also done
some ba
Hey,
We've been meaning to split net.c up for quite a while now,
so here goes with a first cut at.
There shouldn't be anything too controversial here, apart
from CONFIG_LINUX maybe.
I've build tested this on F11, F12 and mingw and also done
some basic runtime testing.
