* Stefan Hajnoczi [2011-01-17 10:32:24]:
> This series needs a new pair of eyes for review. I'm probably missing
> things here after seeing it many times.
>
> posix-aio-compat.c:handle_work() doesn't need to take aiocb_mutex for
> container_of(), which just calculates an address but doesn't act
This series needs a new pair of eyes for review. I'm probably missing
things here after seeing it many times.
posix-aio-compat.c:handle_work() doesn't need to take aiocb_mutex for
container_of(), which just calculates an address but doesn't actually
access the aiocb.
dequeue_work_on_queue() is i
Hi,
This series implements threadlets infrastructure:
Changelog:
* Changed the name aio_thread to handle_work.
* Corrected the usage of aiocb->ret which has to be
accessed under aiocb_mutex.
* Merged the patche which add dequeue_work with the patch
which removes the unused active field in
