On Di, 2015-06-02 at 14:42 +0200, François Revol wrote:
> On 02/06/2015 13:40, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > Yes, that's true. As long as the native version actually works.
> > As I said before, initially it didn't, and sdl was the only
> > driver that worked. Maybe in 0.12, maybe even before, I don
On 02/06/2015 13:40, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Yes, that's true. As long as the native version actually works.
> As I said before, initially it didn't, and sdl was the only
> driver that worked. Maybe in 0.12, maybe even before, I don't
> remember anymore, but the fact remains, in our testing only
02.06.2015 13:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 June 2015 at 10:12, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> SDL audio has been the default in Debian for at least two
>> debian releases because of that, we explicitly used
>> --audio-drv-list=sdl,... to list sdl first. Now we have
>> pa first, but I don't really
On 2 June 2015 at 10:12, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> I also tried alsa, oss and pa, with these audio was more
> distorted than with sdl. Sdl version sounds cleanly, while
> alsa and pa, at least in the past, and at least if memory
> serves me right, sounded like a if a good portion of noize
> has be
On 02/06/2015 11:28, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > SDL audio has been the default in Debian for at least two
> > debian releases because of that, we explicitly used
> > --audio-drv-list=sdl,... to list sdl first. Now we have
> > pa first, but I don't really remember why we changed it.
>
> Useful data
Hi,
> Yes, I use sdl audio with sdl ui, sdl1 version (since
> sdl2 had its shortcomings in qemu, not all functionality
> worked).
Does it work equally well with the gtk ui?
Possibly it makes sense to use keep sdl audio and default to it only in
case sdl ui is active (simliar to how spice audio
02.06.2015 11:08, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mo, 2015-06-01 at 16:38 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 01.06.2015 16:23, Kővágó, Zoltán wrote:
>>> This series of patch removes the following audio backends:
>>> esd, fmod, sdl, winwave.
>>
>> Why do you remove sdl backend?
>>
>> This is my preferred ba
On Mo, 2015-06-01 at 16:38 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 01.06.2015 16:23, Kővágó, Zoltán wrote:
> > This series of patch removes the following audio backends:
> > esd, fmod, sdl, winwave.
>
> Why do you remove sdl backend?
>
> This is my preferred backend so far, it works better
> than all oth
2015-06-01 15:38 keltezéssel, Michael Tokarev írta:
01.06.2015 16:23, Kővágó, Zoltán wrote:
This series of patch removes the following audio backends:
esd, fmod, sdl, winwave.
Why do you remove sdl backend?
This is my preferred backend so far, it works better
than all other backends available
01.06.2015 16:23, Kővágó, Zoltán wrote:
> This series of patch removes the following audio backends:
> esd, fmod, sdl, winwave.
Why do you remove sdl backend?
This is my preferred backend so far, it works better
than all other backends available to me...
Thanks,
/mjt
This series of patch removes the following audio backends:
esd, fmod, sdl, winwave.
It also cleans up the remaining drivers to do not use global variables where
possible. This is a preparation for my GSoC project where I will enable multiple
simultaneous audio backends.
Please also test the corea
11 matches
Mail list logo
