On 10/03/2013 09:34 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/10/2013 15:29, Lei Li ha scritto:
On 10/03/2013 06:34 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/10/2013 12:28, Lei Li ha scritto:
The load_hook callback is only be called if the RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK is
received.
To check this flags, it means there would be
Il 03/10/2013 15:29, Lei Li ha scritto:
> On 10/03/2013 06:34 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 03/10/2013 12:28, Lei Li ha scritto:
>>> The load_hook callback is only be called if the RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK is
>>> received.
>>> To check this flags, it means there would be a check action first in
>>> unix
On 10/03/2013 06:34 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/10/2013 12:28, Lei Li ha scritto:
The load_hook callback is only be called if the RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK is
received.
To check this flags, it means there would be a check action first in
unix_accept_incoming_migration(), like:
f = qemu_fopen_pipe(c
Il 03/10/2013 12:28, Lei Li ha scritto:
>
> The load_hook callback is only be called if the RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK is
> received.
> To check this flags, it means there would be a check action first in
> unix_accept_incoming_migration(), like:
>
> f = qemu_fopen_pipe(c, "rb");
> flags = qemu_get_be64(
On 10/03/2013 04:23 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/10/2013 06:03, Lei Li ha scritto:
Hi Paolo,
When debugging the code, I realized that this problem might still
exist. In the incoming part, it will qemu_fopen_pipe() in
unix_accept_incoming_migration first to enable the load_hook
callback, the c
Il 03/10/2013 06:03, Lei Li ha scritto:
>>>
>
> Hi Paolo,
>
> When debugging the code, I realized that this problem might still
> exist. In the incoming part, it will qemu_fopen_pipe() in
> unix_accept_incoming_migration first to enable the load_hook
> callback, the check action of this RAM_SAVE_
On 09/26/2013 08:44 PM, Lei Li wrote:
On 09/25/2013 11:02 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 25/09/2013 16:32, Lei Li ha scritto:
This RFC patch series tries to introduce a mechanism using side
channel pipe for RAM via SCM_RIGHTS with unix domain socket
protocol migration.
This side channel will be u
Il 26/09/2013 14:44, Lei Li ha scritto:
>>
>> The basis of your code will still be the socket-based QEMUFile, but
>> you'll need your own QEMUFile since you're adding Unix-specific
>> functionality. For this it is not a problem to have two copies the
>> QEMUFile code for sockets, one in savevm.c a
On 09/25/2013 11:02 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 25/09/2013 16:32, Lei Li ha scritto:
This RFC patch series tries to introduce a mechanism using side
channel pipe for RAM via SCM_RIGHTS with unix domain socket
protocol migration.
This side channel will be used for the page flipping by vmsplice,
Il 25/09/2013 16:32, Lei Li ha scritto:
> This RFC patch series tries to introduce a mechanism using side
> channel pipe for RAM via SCM_RIGHTS with unix domain socket
> protocol migration.
>
> This side channel will be used for the page flipping by vmsplice,
> which will be the internal mechanism
This RFC patch series tries to introduce a mechanism using side
channel pipe for RAM via SCM_RIGHTS with unix domain socket
protocol migration.
This side channel will be used for the page flipping by vmsplice,
which will be the internal mechanism for localhost migration that
we are trying to add.
11 matches
Mail list logo
