On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 02:05:52PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 15/09/2015 20:45, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > Best guess, since I can't find any code that actually uses them.
> > Linux actively turns them off at boot...
>
> I've sent a kvm-unit-tests patch to test debug extensions. It shows
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 02:05:52PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 15/09/2015 20:45, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > Best guess, since I can't find any code that actually uses them.
> > Linux actively turns them off at boot...
>
> I've sent a kvm-unit-tests patch to test debug extensions. It
On 21/09/2015 16:05, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 02:05:52PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 15/09/2015 20:45, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> Best guess, since I can't find any code that actually uses them.
>>> Linux actively turns them off at boot...
>>
>> I've sent a kvm-uni
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 02:05:52PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 15/09/2015 20:45, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > Best guess, since I can't find any code that actually uses them.
> > Linux actively turns them off at boot...
>
> I've sent a kvm-unit-tests patch to test debug extensions. It shows
On 15/09/2015 20:45, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Best guess, since I can't find any code that actually uses them.
> Linux actively turns them off at boot...
I've sent a kvm-unit-tests patch to test debug extensions. It shows
that debug extensions work, but the following needs to be squashed in
p
Best guess, since I can't find any code that actually uses them.
Linux actively turns them off at boot...
r~
Richard Henderson (8):
target-i386: Move breakpoint related functions to new file
target-i386: Make check_hw_breakpoints static
target-i386: Introduce cpu_x86_update_dr7
target-i
