On 19 October 2010 08:17, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> Am 19.10.2010 um 02:10 schrieb Anthony Liguori :
>
>> On 10/18/2010 06:29 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
A user will get a really nasty surprise if they think they can use a flag
or rely on QEMU to prevent a VM from doing something nasty wi
Am 19.10.2010 um 02:10 schrieb Anthony Liguori :
> On 10/18/2010 06:29 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> A user will get a really nasty surprise if they think they can use a flag
>>> or rely on QEMU to prevent a VM from doing something nasty with a device.
>>> If they have this feeling of security
On 10/18/2010 06:29 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
A user will get a really nasty surprise if they think they can use a flag or
rely on QEMU to prevent a VM from doing something nasty with a device. If they
have this feeling of security, they're likely to chmod the device to allow
unprivileged use
On 30.08.2009, at 02:14, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>> The guest can also mess up other devices with the help of specially
>> crafted firmware. So even if the user does not care about the effects on
>> a particular device, a firmware upgrade might affect other devices
