On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:30:38AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:20:32AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:48:59PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > This is a follow-up to the patch submitted by Michael (patch 1/6 in this
> > > series), t
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:20:32AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:48:59PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > This is a follow-up to the patch submitted by Michael (patch 1/6 in this
> > series), to make the pc compat initialization code simpler and easier to
> > eventu
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:48:59PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> This is a follow-up to the patch submitted by Michael (patch 1/6 in this
> series), to make the pc compat initialization code simpler and easier to
> eventually remove code duplication between pc_piix.c and pc_q35.c.
Eduardo this d
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:48:59PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> This is a follow-up to the patch submitted by Michael (patch 1/6 in this
> series), to make the pc compat initialization code simpler and easier to
> eventually remove code duplication between pc_piix.c and pc_q35.c.
OK, patch 1/6
This is a follow-up to the patch submitted by Michael (patch 1/6 in this
series), to make the pc compat initialization code simpler and easier to
eventually remove code duplication between pc_piix.c and pc_q35.c.
Eduardo Habkost (5):
pc: Kill pc_init_pci_1_0()
pc: Create pc_compat_*() function
