On 27/11/18 17:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:04:59AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 26/11/18 23:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 02:20:38PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
vhost does not have to be supported only if KVM is present, in fact
>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:04:59AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 26/11/18 23:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 02:20:38PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> vhost does not have to be supported only if KVM is present, in fact
> >> vhost-user does not even need any kind of ke
On 26/11/18 23:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 02:20:38PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> vhost does not have to be supported only if KVM is present, in fact
>> vhost-user does not even need any kind of kernel support. This series
>> changes this. The rationale is that, whe
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 02:20:38PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> vhost does not have to be supported only if KVM is present, in fact
> vhost-user does not even need any kind of kernel support. This series
> changes this. The rationale is that, when vhost-user-test.c will be
> converted to qgraph,
vhost does not have to be supported only if KVM is present, in fact
vhost-user does not even need any kind of kernel support. This series
changes this. The rationale is that, when vhost-user-test.c will be
converted to qgraph, it will be able to test vhost-user support
for virtio-mmio backend eve
