On 16/09/2016 05:04, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:09:34AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:48:22PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>> Define and use trace_spapr_XXX functions instead of
>>> DPRINTF to trace some SPAPR devices: spapr_vio, spapr_drc, spapr_
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:09:34AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:48:22PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > Define and use trace_spapr_XXX functions instead of
> > DPRINTF to trace some SPAPR devices: spapr_vio, spapr_drc, spapr_rtas,
> > spapr_llan, spapr_vscsi.
> >
> > Th
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:48:22PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Define and use trace_spapr_XXX functions instead of
> DPRINTF to trace some SPAPR devices: spapr_vio, spapr_drc, spapr_rtas,
> spapr_llan, spapr_vscsi.
>
> This allows to enable dynamically (instead of recompiling the source)
> the
Define and use trace_spapr_XXX functions instead of
DPRINTF to trace some SPAPR devices: spapr_vio, spapr_drc, spapr_rtas,
spapr_llan, spapr_vscsi.
This allows to enable dynamically (instead of recompiling the source)
the traces for these devices. Messages are close as possible as
messages used by
